"He who fails to plan is planning to fail" - Winston Churchill
How do we Plan for Instruction?
The key to
undertaking any task great or small is to have a plan. A plan needs to include
what your goals are, how you will accomplish them, what you need to accomplish
them, and in what time frame you plan to accomplish them. Planning for
Instruction is no different. Teachers must identify their goals for their
students and how/when those goals will be met.
When looking at mapping out your instruction fist start with your
instructional area- specifically what your content will focus on. Next, you
include your unit of instruction, which is typically framed as a situation or
concern. For example, when teaching
poultry unit, a problem area to address could include “Establishing a Laying Flock.” Each
lesson within this unit will be framed as questions that require answering, and
when they can be answered, address the problem area. An example lesson might be
“what are the characteristics of a
productive hen?” Students will learn what makes a hen productive, which
will be used to establish a laying flock.
Planning
allows for the teacher to focus on specific competencies and objectives they
have for their learners. A thorough plan allows for a teacher and students to
make sense of the information being presented and apply it to legitimate needs.
Students need to have a felt-need—a cultivated desire to learn and understand
the material. When teaching is planned accordingly, clarity and variability can
be established. Teachers who plan their lessons can more clearly communicate
what it is they expect from students, and students are able to comprehend why
and how they will they can meet those expectations.
What are the similarities between Significant Learning; Understanding by Design and the Universal Design for Learning?
Understanding by Design
framework is an approach to planning units of instruction starting with
examining the competencies you want students to meet and working backwards from
there. When using this approach, instructors must also establish how those
competencies will be satisfactorily met. It is similar to the Significant
Learning in as well as the Universal Design for learning in that these learning
outcomes are determined before the methods to reach those outcomes are put into
place. Variety and continual assessment are key in all three approaches to unit
planning. When I read about these approaches, I was confused as to why the
process was considered “backward planning”. Shouldn’t all instruction be
planned with learning objectives in mind rather than a methods first approach? Unfortunately,
the later can dominate the profession, and teachers tend to frame their learning
objectives around a textbook or activity rather than the other way around. Having
clearly defined and stated learning objectives are key regardless of the approach
to planning.
How you will incorporate the three pillars of
Universal Design for Learning: multiple means of representation, multiple means
of action and expression, and multiple means of engagement?
These
pillars of the Universal Design for Learning are simply practices that allow a
teacher to plan variance into their planning process—a key characteristic of
effective teachers. Choosing multiple means of representation would include
using a variety of approaches in presenting content to students. For example,
when discussing the different types of milk product students can match pictures,
watch a video on chocolate milk production in Pa, or do a cheese making lab.
Each activity would allow for a different means of presenting the material and
provide a variety of ways a student can make sense of that content and show
what they know.
What is Scaffolding?
Scaffolding
is the approach by which teachers begin teaching at the students’ level of
comprehension and build from there. Once a need or objective for the material
is established, the teacher needs to make the material flow in a logical way.
Using the poultry example above, I can’t expect students to select hens for egg
production without first teaching them what makes a hen a better egg producer.
I can’t teach them what those characteristics are until they understand what
makes a chicken a chicken and not something else. I must start with the basics they understand and then proceed with lessons that require that fundamental knowledge to conceptualize.

Ryan, your blog post does an excellent job of connecting this week's readings to personal experiences and the ag ed classroom. I like how you used the example of a poultry unit to tie the different concepts together and show how they work in combination to create effective planning. The only thing that could have enhanced your blog post would have been visuals to tie everything together.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed how you had this blog broke up visually. I was also a little confused on the “backward planning” as.
ReplyDeleteYou're spot on with everything planning provides a teacher, but as you know, planning takes time. We all know it pays off, but how do you plan (make time for) for planning?
ReplyDeleteI think that you did a great job organizing and "dissecting" this weeks readings! I was also confused as to why it was called backward planning as it just simply makes sense to me. I believe I may have mentioned it in my post but I would just be confused and have no idea what to do if I didn't use the "backward planning" method. Great job!
ReplyDelete